This paper is concerned with testing for causation, using the Granger definition, in a bivariate time-series context. It is argued that a sound and natural approach to such tests must rely primarily on the out-of-sample forecasting performance of models relating the original (non-prewhitened) series of interest. A specific technique of this sort is presented and employed to investigate the relation between aggregate advertising and aggregate consumption spending. The null hypothesis that advertising does not cause consumption cannot be rejected, but some evidence suggesting that consumption may cause advertising is presented.
MLA
Granger, C. W. J., et al. “Advertising and Aggregate Consumption: An Analysis of Causality.” Econometrica, vol. 48, .no 5, Econometric Society, 1980, pp. 1149-1168, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912176
Chicago
Granger, C. W. J., R. Ashley, and R. Schmalensee. “Advertising and Aggregate Consumption: An Analysis of Causality.” Econometrica, 48, .no 5, (Econometric Society: 1980), 1149-1168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912176
APA
Granger, C. W. J., Ashley, R., & Schmalensee, R. (1980). Advertising and Aggregate Consumption: An Analysis of Causality. Econometrica, 48(5), 1149-1168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912176
We are deeply saddened by the passing of Kate Ho, the John L. Weinberg Professor of Economics and Business Policy at Princeton University and a Fellow of the Econometric Society. Kate was a brilliant IO economist and scholar whose impact on the profession will resonate for many years to come.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.