This paper analyzes durable goods monopoly in an infinite-horizon, discrete-time game. We prove that, as the time interval between successive offers approaches zero, all seller payoffs between zero and static monopoly profits are supported by subgame perfect equilibria. This reverses a well-known conjecture of Coase. Alternatively, one can interpret the model as a sequential bargaining game with one-sided incomplete information in which an uniformed seller makes all the offers. Our folk theorem for seller payoffs equally applies to the set of sequential equilibria of this bargaining game.
MLA
Ausubel, Lawrence M., and Raymond J. Deneckere. “Reputation in Bargaining and Durable Goods Monopoly.” Econometrica, vol. 57, .no 3, Econometric Society, 1989, pp. 511-531, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1911050
Chicago
Ausubel, Lawrence M., and Raymond J. Deneckere. “Reputation in Bargaining and Durable Goods Monopoly.” Econometrica, 57, .no 3, (Econometric Society: 1989), 511-531. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1911050
APA
Ausubel, L. M., & Deneckere, R. J. (1989). Reputation in Bargaining and Durable Goods Monopoly. Econometrica, 57(3), 511-531. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1911050
We are deeply saddened by the passing of Kate Ho, the John L. Weinberg Professor of Economics and Business Policy at Princeton University and a Fellow of the Econometric Society. Kate was a brilliant IO economist and scholar whose impact on the profession will resonate for many years to come.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.