The Econometric SocietyEdited by: Guido W. Imbens • Print ISSN: 0012-9682 • Online ISSN: 1468-0262
Robert M. Anderson and Haosui Duanmu
This supplementary material consists of a section discussing the limitations of partial equilibrium analysis and disposal cone, a section on Rebate Walras Law, proofs of Propositions 1 and 2 in Anderson and Duanmu (2025), a special case of Theorem 2 in Anderson and Duanmu (2025), and detailed analysis of the examples from Anderson and Duanmu (2025).
Nikhil Agarwal, Charles Hodgson, and Paulo Somaini
The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14025855. The authors were granted an exemption to publish their data because either access to the data is restricted or the authors do not have the right to republish them. However, the authors included in the package a simulated or synthetic dataset that allows running their codes. The Journal checked the synthetic/simulated data and the codes for their ability to generate all tables and figures in the paper and approved online appendices. However, the synthetic/simulated data are not designed to reproduce the same results.
Nikhil Agarwal, Charles Hodgson, and Paulo Somaini
This supplement contains material not found within the manuscript.
Yiting Chen and Songfa Zhong
The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14402442. The Journal checked the data and codes included in the package for their ability to reproduce the results in the paper and approved online appendices.
Yiting Chen and Songfa Zhong
This appendix contains material not found within the manuscript.
Kei Kawai and Takeaki Sunada
The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14172367. The authors were granted an exemption to publish parts of their data because either access to these data is restricted or the authors do not have the right to republish them. Therefore, the replication package only includes the codes and the parts of the data that are not subject to the exemption. However, the authors provided the Journal with (or assisted the Journal to obtain) temporary access to the restricted data. The Journal checked the provided and restricted data and the codes for their ability to reproduce the results in the paper and approved online appendices. Given the highly demanding nature of the algorithms, the reproducibility checks were run on a simplified version of the code, which is also available in the replication package.Kei Kawai and Takeaki Sunada
In the Online Appendix, we provide proofs that we omit from the main text as well as details regarding the model, estimation, data construction and applications to other environments. In Section 10.1, we describe the model of open-seat elections. In Section 10.2, we show that at the estimated parameter values, the challenger’s value function, vC, is not too decreasing in qC: the condition that ensures that the challenger’s entry decision follows a cutoff strategy. In Section 10.3, we provide a derivation of GqC,pC (·|s) and p(s, qC, pC) as a function of ¯qC(s, pC) for general N. In Section 10.4, we prove Proposition 1 (Injectivity) and Proposition 2 (Sufficient statistic). In Section 10.5, we discuss how we forwardsimulate the continuation value. We provide details of the estimation procedure in Section 10.6 and data construction in Section 10.7. In Section 10.8, we show how our approach can be extended to environments in which qI is time-varying, and one in which there are few uncontested elections. In Section 10.9, we present histograms of our valence measures after accounting for sampling error by applying Bayes shrinkage. In Section 10.10, weAndrew Garin, Dmitri Koustas, Carl McPherson, Samuel Norris, Matthew Pecenco, Evan K. Rose, Yotam Shem-Tov, and Jeffrey Weaver
The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14283611. The authors were granted an exemption to publish parts of their data because either access to these data is restricted or the authors do not have the right to republish them. However, the authors included in the package, on top of the codes and the parts of the data that are not subject to the exemption, a simulated or synthetic dataset that allows running the codes. The Journal checked the data and the codes for their ability to generate all tables and figures in the paper and approved online appendices. Whenever the available data allowed, the Journal also checked for their ability to reproduce the results. However, the synthetic/simulated data are not designed to produce the same results.
Andrew Garin, Dmitri Koustas, Carl McPherson, Samuel Norris, Matthew Pecenco, Evan K. Rose, Yotam Shem-Tov, and Jeffrey Weaver
This appendix contains material not found within the manuscript.
Christoph Breunig, Ruixuan Liu, and Zhengfei Yu
The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14015435. The Journal checked the data and codes included in the package for their ability to reproduce the results in the paper and approved online appendices.
Christoph Breunig, Ruixuan Liu, and Zhengfei Yu
Supplemental Appendix
Christoph Carnehl and Johannes Schneider
This supplement contains material not found within the manuscript.
Jonas E. Arias, Juan F. Rubio-Ramírez, and Daniel F. Waggoner
The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13936707. The Journal checked the data and codes included in the package for their ability to reproduce the results in the paper and approved online appendices.
Giuseppe Cavaliere, Thomas Mikosch, Anders Rahbek, and Frederik Vilandt
The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13993686. The Journal checked the data and codes included in the package for their ability to reproduce the results in the paper and approved online appendices.
